Previously: Jack Kirby plotted the Fantastic Four.
This page: Jack Kirby created the all the major characters:Fantastic Four Hulk Spider-Man Thor Iron Man Dr Strange X-Men
See also: Who was the better writer? The Kirbyverse
Stan Lee is famous for his bad memory. E.g.
"My memory is not the best,"
"I have the worst memory in the world,"
"obviously my memory is wrong." (Source)
This is not a new thing. "I even had a bad memory when I was young. I'd call him 'Bob Banner' instead of 'Bruce Banner,' etc. I hadda give out a heap of no-prizes!" (Stan Lee, on Twitter)
For example, for years Lee told the story of how he got his first job in comics by answering a newspaper ad. When confronted with evidence that actually his uncle got him the job, Lee admitted "I've been saying this [classified-ad] story for years, but apparently it isn't so. And I can't remember because I['ve] said it so long now that I believe it." (See Joe Simon's 1990 autobiography, "The Comic Book Makers").
Readers may also recall Stan's claim (in the famous 1966 newspaper interview) that he won the Herald Tribune competition three times. That claim has been thoroughly investigated and found to be false. (See "Stan Lee and the Rise and Fall of the American Comic Book" p.6).
Poor memory makes a person unreliable. Or worse:
“Poor memory advocates — too often — want to be given a blank check for what comes out of their mouths.” “Can a man/mind with a claimed poor memory have any authentic, personal integrity?” “There are those who make reference to, justifications for, their poor memory but poor memory doesn’t stop them from still claiming facts, truth, credit.” (See Steve Ditko's Essay #34: Memory)
Fortunately we do not need to rely on Lee's memory. On this page we will look at other evidence for how the Marvel Universe was created.
"Martin [Goodman, the publisher, and Stan's uncle by marriage] mentioned that he had noticed one of the titles published by National Comics seemed to be selling better than most. It was a book called The [sic] Justice League of America and it was composed of a team of superheroes . . . 'if the Justice League is selling', spoke he, 'why don't we put out a comic book that features a team of superheroes?'" Joan [Stan's wife] was commenting about the fact that after 20 years of producing comics I was still writing television material, advertising copy, and newspaper features in my spare time. She wondered why I didn't put as much effort and creativity into the comics as I seemed to be putting into my other freelance endeavors. . . . [her] little dissertation made me suddenly realize that it was time to start concentrating on what I was doing — to carve a real career for myself in the nowhere world of comic books."
just this once, I would do the type of story I myself would enjoy
reading.... And the characters would be the kind of characters I could
personally relate to: they'd be flesh and blood, they'd have their
faults and foibles, they'd be fallible and feisty, and — most important
of all — inside their colorful, costumed booties they'd still have feet
"After kicking it around with Martin and Jack for a while, I decided to call our quaint quartet The Fantastic Four. I wrote a detailed first synopsis for Jack to follow, and the rest is history." (Stan Lee , "Origins of Marvel Comics")
Stan often retold that story, with more details:
It's an attractive story
This story is repeated everywhere. It's popular to read. Stan writes enjoyable prose: I love reading it! It's easy to read and full of memorable images. I love the lines "spoke he", and "colorful costumed booties", and the references to "Joanie" and golf. The story, that Stan was a TV writer who was too good for comics and wanted to quit, was itself like something from a comic! Stan as comic book hero. Stan's greatest creation is himself.
... but is the story real? Readers with good memories will recall a similar claim by Stan, written back in 1947, called "Secrets behind the comics". In it, Stan claimed that Captain America was the result of Martin Goodman's foresight and genius. Even though Goodman simply bought a book that was already created by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby. Perhaps we should look again at Stan's claims:
Stan wanted to quit
This part is supported by the surrounding evidence, but not quite the way Stan tells it. Rather than Stan being a TV and newspaper writer who could choose other jobs, Stan was a desperate man. Stan had run his uncle's comics since he left school, with a business model of copying other people's ideas. When the comics business slumped in the 1950s (largely due to Fredric Wertham) his uncle's comics lost their distributor and almost collapsed. Dick Ayers recalls: "Things started to get really bad in 1958. One day when I went in Stan looked at me and said, “Gee whiz, my uncle goes by and he doesn’t even say hello to me.” He meant Martin Goodman. And he proceeds to tell me, “You know, it’s like a sinking ship and we’re the rats, and we’ve got to get off.” When I told Stan I was going to work for the post office, he said, “Before you do that let me send you something that you’ll ink.” (source) Stan was a nice guy. He wanted to help those around him who were losing their jobs. But he was in a very weak position himself.
"I was writing television material television material, advertising copy, and newspaper features"
This quote implies that Stan was a successful writer. But when you look closer it tells the opposite story. . In danger of losing his job, Stan tried creating a newspaper strip, called Willie Lumpkin. That was for "Publishers Syndicate", "a relatively small outfit" and "1960 was the only year the syndicate advertised it to potential buyers". (source) A few newspapers carried it for a while, but the last one stopped after 18 months. I can't find any other evidence of Stan Lee writing either "television material", "advertising copy", or "newspaper features". He probably sent off scripts, and no doubt did the odd job for his uncle's publications. But when in the 1970s he tried selling scripts he was generally unsuccessful, despite his fame from Marvel.
The golf game with Jack Liebowitz?
Comics historian Michael Uslan has researched this and it simply did not
happen. Jack Liebowitz did not play golf. It was suggested that maybe
Stan meant Irwin Donenfeld, but that didn't happen either. Could
it be somebody else? Maybe, but why would you play golf with your direct
competitor, and then give him your most valuable trade secrets, your
sales figures? Goodman relied on copying trends, so he would have
inside information from somewhere, but probably not golf.
The Justice League as motivation?
If the motivation was "create a superhero team", then why didn't they do it? The powers are not important to the early plots:
The early stories was about a team of adventurers, with super powers as un unnecessary afterthought.
Stan discussed it with Jack first
Stan wrote: "After kicking it around with Martin and Jack for a while, i decided to call our quaint quartet The Fantastic Four. I wrote a detailed first synopsis for Jack to follow, and the rest is history." This is the one part that agrees with all the evidence: Stan Lee discussed the possibilities with Jack Kirby "for a while" before deciding anything. This "Marvel method" is discussed in detail on the "who did what" page. Kicking it around for a while is the key. Then Stan wrote down his understanding of what they decided. Then Jack went away and created the story.
Sue was engaged?
Stan said, "I had the girl in the series actually be engaged to the hero". It is true that in FF 1 Stan's dialog calls her Reed's fiancée. But that is contradicted by both the art and the later story. The art shows her to be an active part of the planning team, and so joins the crew on her own merits: rather than Stan raising the profile of women he reduces her to going into space just because she is Reed's girlfriend, a story point that is justifiably mocked. Three issues later she has Namor's photo, not Reeds, and does not get engaged to Reed until issue 35. Rather than creating the FF, it looks like Stan is dialoging somebody else's story and changing it but not paying attention.
Stan disliked simple plots?
Stan said, "I really wanted to leave, because one edict that my
publisher had was that the stories had to be geared towards young
readers; or unintelligent older readers. We weren't supposed to use
words of more than two syllables, and we had to have simple plots; no
continuing stories, because he felt our readers weren't smart enough to
remember from month to month where they had left off. It was really
boring." But compare Stan's dialog with Jack's art. Or if
you don't find that convincing, compare Stan's then current newspaper
strip (Willie Lumpkin) with Jack's much better selling Sky masters. Stan
had complete freedom with Willie Lumpkin, yet provided one of the
simplest. least demanding strips out there. Or compare Stan and Jack's
work once they parted in 1970. Who had the simpler plots and easy to
read dialog? Who had been editing Jack's work to make it simpler? Maybe
Stan was right. Maybe he did want more complex work, but just not as
complex as Jack was supplying. but the evidence always shows him
choosing to simplify stuff.
Stan disliked secret identities?
Stan said, "Instead of the typical heroes that have secret identities and nobody knows who they are, I did The Fantastic Four; where everybody knew who they were." but Stan's dialog says otherwise. Issue 2 refers to "one of the Fantastic Four's many secret apartment hideouts". Perhaps this is due to that particular story? No, the cover to the next issue refers to their skyscraper "hide-out" and inside it is called "their secret headquarters". It quickly become obvious to Stan that a "secret skyscraper" was an oxymoron, especially when the art shows the team travelling there undisguised, in a flying car with bright searchlights, so Stan stopped referring to it as secret. But as late as issue 7, Stan's dialog said that Johnny Storm had a secret identity (in Strange Tales 101, published the same month). Again this contradicted the art and the idea was soon dropped.
Stan disliked costumes?
Stan said, "I didn't
have them wear colorful costumes. I always felt that if I had
super-power, I wouldn't immediately run out to the store and buy a
costume." Yet by issue 3 they had costumes.The
pencils show the costumes originally had masks to hide the identity,
but these masks were later erased. Why would Jack Kirby draw masks? He
had to draw the team in everyday life, including being singled out at
the theater in FF 2. He drew the Thing, and knew full well that a secret
identity would be impossible for him. He drew the Invisible Girl, and
knew that she did not need one either, as she could just turn invisible
if she wanted privacy. nd he drew the Human Torch, who often hid his face
by staying flamed on. So Jack knew that secret identities were
absurd. The only person who could have demanded them was Stan, and this
indicates that he only had a rough idea of what was going on. The usual
explanation for costumes is that fans demanded them. But this was too
early for much fan feedback, due to the time lag in writing and printing
comics. Yes, issue 3 had the first letters page, but one letter was
from "S. Brodsky" (Sol Brodsky the production manager, who managed to
list all the company's products in his letter) and another was
"unsigned" and sounding suspiciously like something Stan Lee would
write. Perhaps the other letters were genuine? But the letters page is
added last of all, after the comic is plotted, pencilled, inked, etc. So
there would be even fewer letters when the costume decision was made.
For somebody who hates costumes Stan seemed to be in a great hurry to
Stan did it his way?
The core of the matter is that Stan decided to suddenly write great
stories. Which is something he had never done before or since. He spent
his life copying whatever kind of comic was already popular, so he was
very good at writing quickly and creating passable stories. He was good
at easy to read dialog and over-selling. But he had zero track record of
creating anything successful, either before or since. Stan's list of
original creations before 1961 includes... well, Willie Lumpkin. A
gentle humour that didn't sell particularly well or for very long. And
that's about it. Meanwhile Jack Kirby had created or co-created Captain
America, the entire romance genre, original titles about dreams, war,
space, westerns, pretty much anything you can imagine.
OK, fine. But Stan admitted that he had not really tried until then. Perhaps he suddenly got good? Then where is Stan's track record after he left Marvel? We have Stripperella, and... that's about the only memorable one. But Jack Kirby continued creating original characters that still sell today: Darkseid, OMAC, Mr Miracle, Kamandi, Eternals, and many many more. How likely is it that Stan Lee had a sudden and once-only flash of inspiration when he was around Jack Kirby (or Steve Ditko) and not at any other time?
The story synopsisYears later, a brief synopsis was found, outlining one third of Fantastic Four issue 1. Stan remembered this as being a script, written before Kirby ws involved. However, all the evidence indicates that it was a summary of what was decided at the story meeting. It was therefore written after the discussion with Kirby.
In summary, Stan seems to be looking back at what Jack Kirby brought to the Fantastic Four, and taking credit for it. Stan's explanation does not make sense. But there is an alternative explanation, and it is arises from the documents themselves:
Jack's version of events
According to Neal Kirby (Jack's son) Jack intended the FF to be a continuation of his Challengers of the Unknown series. This is from Neal's legal statement in the battles with Marvel:
Q What information, if any, do you have concerning the creation of The Fantastic Four?
A In discussions with my father The Fantastic Four basically was a derivative of the, from what he told me, basically he came up with the idea just as a derivative from the Challengers of the Unknown that he had done several years earlier. (source)
This explains so much:
We do not have to rely on Kirby's recollection, the timeline of events
speaks for itself.
Pre-1958: Jack Kirby creates many hit comics
Kirby was far more famous than Stan Lee: Kirby's name appeared on the covers of many comics, along with his frequent partner Joe Simon. Simon and Kirby created Captain America, they created the entire romance comic genre, and much more. Kirby's entire career was spent creating new comic ideas.
Pre-1958: Stan Lee copies other people's ideas
Lee's career up to this point was in copying other people's ideas: if
a comic was a hit for somebody else, Lee produced an imitation. That
was just Lee's job. He worked for his uncle, Martin Goodman, and that
was Goodman's method. For details, see "The Secret History of Marvel
Comics" by Blake Bell and Michael Vassallo.
1958, April: Challengers
At this point, Kirby was still mostly working for DC. He created "Challengers of the Unknown" for them, about a team of four daredevils who explore the dangerous and unknown. Many people have noted the similarities with the Fantastic Four: similar origin, similar promotional pictures, similar costumes, similar stories, similar powers (in one story), etc.
1958: Sky Masters
Kirby creates "Sky Masters of the Space Force", a newspaper strip about conquering space. It becomes successful, but Jack was helped by his DC editor Jack Schiff, who wanted a cut of the money. Jack thought they had only agreed to a one off payment.
1958, Dec: Timely
Bad feeling with Schiff at DC led to Kirby taking freelance work with Timely, who were then in dire trouble.
1959, June: fired from Challengers
Kirby is sacked from Challengers, as part of the dispute with Schiff. Schiff gives the reason that "ideas from the Challengers story conferences were finding their way into Kirby's Sky Masters work." (see Ronin, "Tales To Astonish").
1959-60: Jack suggests superheroes
Now Jack is in urgent need of well paying work. But Timely is doing poorly and paying poorly. So Kirby comes up with as many ideas as he can. He helped invent Captain America, so he would naturally suggest superheroes. But Timely relies on its bigger competitor, National (i.e. DC) for distribution, Goodman does not want to annoy DC by competing directly with DC superheroes.
1961, early: Sky Masters ends
Kirby stops Sky Masters, due to the cost of the legal dispute
1961, early: Mole Man story
It seems likely that as one of his many monster stories, Kirby creates the Mole Man story, featuring a team like the Challengers. This was not published in its original form, but was later adapted for FF issue 1.
1961, April: first man in space
Suddenly space is a hot topic, just at the time when Kirby has stopped his space comic and has ideas to spare.
1961, April: Justice League
The first sales figures for Justice League make superheroes seem viable again
1961, April: Challengers with super powers tacked on
Goodman approves a comic that mixes sci-fi and superheroes. It uses Kirby's Mole Man story, and adds a version of Kirby's "Challengers of the Unknown" origin with added super powers. It looks like a monster comic from the outside, so DC does not see it as competition for the Justice League.
1961-1962: Challengers/Sky Masters FF
Kirby continues his Sky Masters theme of space travel (issues 1,2,6,7). DC does not complain about the super powers. Sales of the try out book are excellent. Goodman now feels superheroes are a safe bet.
The Hulk is a continuation of Kirby's other work at the time, creating Frankenstein-type monsters of all kinds (sometimes called "The Hulk")...
He also created Jekyl and Hyde characters. This page, from Kirby's story "Midnight Monsters" appeared just a few months before similar scenes in The Hulk:
Of course, Stan Lee was involved in those two examples. But Lee made no real difference: Kirby was creating the same kind of thing in the months before he rejoined Lee. His Challengers of the Unknown, for example, often featured monsters:
And this sequence, from Kirby's solo work Sky masters, is almost identical to the origin of the later Hulk (thanks to Comic Book Historians for finding this):
It's not just the Hulk himself: the secondary characters are often straight from Kirby's earlier work. Such as The Ringmaster and his Circus of Crime.
Here I will argue that Jack Kirby had the original idea for
Spider-Man, but Steve Ditko then handled the plot and art. Ditko made
Spider-Man a hit:
KIRBY: My initial concept was practically the same. But the credit for
developing Spider-Man goes to Steve Ditko; he wrote it and he drew it
and he refined it. Steve Ditko is a thorough professional. And he an
intellect. Personality wise, he’s a bit withdrawn, but there are lots of
people like that. But Steve Ditko, despite the fact that he doesn’t
disco– although he may now; I haven’t seen him for a long time– Steve
developed Spider-Man and made a salable item out of it." (source)
This raises some questions:
Shooter on the Kirby Spider-Man costume
Kirby Spider-Man pages: I saw, and held in my hand, exactly one
such page. It was a page of design drawings. I remember that his
version of Spider-Man had a "Web-Gun" and wore trunks, I think,
like Captain America's. He was far bigger and bulkier than
Ditko's version. There were no similarities to Ditko's
Spider-Man costume. I think he had boots with flaps. There were
notes in he margin that described the character, again, nothing
like the Ditko version. I think there was something about him
being related to, or having some connection with a police
official, which was how he'd find out about trouble going
on. It was a long time ago, I can't swear to that last
item, but I can swear to the fact that it wasn't similar to the
Ditko version. I remember thinking, "This isn't at all like
P.S. I must have seen that page when I was in Sol's office and he was going through the rejects stack looking for pages for me to try inking. I don't think I ever got to look through those pages again.
P.P.S. Years later, 1986, I had occasion to talk with Jack at the San Diego Con. He insisted that he created Spider-Man. I told him that I'd spoken to Steve Ditko, Sol, and other people who were there at the time, including Stan, obviously, and that they all agreed that Steve's version was the one that was used, though Jack did his version first. I reported everything I'd seen and heard. We talked about the costume -- the bib and belt combo, the stripes down the arms, the mask, the symbols, a very Ditko-esque design. Jack was having some problems with his memory by then, but he thought about it for a minute, then said that maybe Steve should get the credit. He'd be okay with that. A little later, he was on stage and clearly had forgotten our conversation. He and Roz did, however, come to Marvel's 25th Anniversary Party that evening, which made me very happy. There's a story about that, too, but it will wait for another time."
Stan Lee provided
So on balance, Kirby created Spider-Man, but Ditko made it a financial hit.
This is the third time Kirby created a Thor character (source). Note the distinctive chest plate and interest in Loki. Each time the story centers on the hammer as the source of his power.
Here is Thor splitting a tree with the hammer, in the Marvel origin and in a previous Kirby version:
Iron Man is a reworking of an earlier Kirby character, Metallo.
The idea of being forced to create a scientific miracle by a south east Asian warlord is from this Kirby comic for DC:
Many people have commented on how Dr Strange is very similar to a Dr Droom (D-R-oom) from Amazing Adventures issue 1, in 1961. "Stan Lee has been quoted as saying Doctor Strange was kind of his second try at Doctor Droom." (source)
The story is credited to Stan Lee with pencils by Kirby and Ditko, so
it was probably Kirby's rough outlines and Ditko added the details. The
poses on page 1 for example are classic Kirby: indeed, the poses
throughout. Whereas some of the detail looks very Ditko-esque. That was
normal for first issues: if Kirby didn't have time to draw the whole
thing he would quickly rough it out for somebody else. According to the
Marvel Method, which was in use in 1961, Kirby should have plotted it as
well. We can see that he probably did from the art: it has been
changed, indicating that the original art had a different story. Why
would Stan Lee change his own story, and in such an odd way?
Evidence for changes
Look at that weird ending, where Dr Droom gets a Chinese face. That isn't a Kirby or Ditko face, somebody else has drawn it on (or possible Kirby or Ditko in a hurry). It's also a very weird ending: no decent story teller would have planned that. And look at the large amount of text crammed into the last pages: the artist did not expect that much text. But if we remove the weird face and the dialog the pictures tell a different story:
The old magician is on his death bed. The stranger hears something shocking. They embrace their hands, and some magical thing happens. Then the master is never seen again, but the stranger touches his face, and the servant treats him as the new master. Clearly the westerner has become the master. but that would mean he looked the same, and that might confuse readers. Plus he would be a very old hero, and Stan would not want that - kids can't relate to an ancient hero. So it looks like Stan got somebody to redraw the face. the face had to change - the art was clear - so Stan just had him turn Chinese instead, and wrote some extra dialog to explain it.
The flat face on page 1
Another point in favour of being redrawn is the strange face of the hero at the start. It's flat, poorly drawn, so different from the three dimensional faces elsewhere. Kirby and Ditko drew better faces than that. And why all the crammed dialog saying that Droom was interested in Tibet? If we take away the dialog and the art tells a simpler story. The bald head, easy chair and pipe indicate that Droom was simply retired. The other doctors were too busy to go on a wild goose chase, but Droom was retired, so why not? And look closely at the hero's face throughout the story (if you can find the original): several shots suggest that he was either quite old or perhaps had a scar, or some sickness. And note the similarity with the Dr Doom origin! Age or a scar could make him a misfit, and more willing to go to Tibet. Indeed, the story might not have been about a sick magician, but about Droom trying to heal himself?
The name Droom
The name "Droom" means "a fantastic but vain hope (from fantasies induced by the opium pipe)". (Vocabulary.com) Droom hoped to heal himself, but instead became the healer. However, Stan Lee likes his male heroes to be idealised (and preferably saving a helpless female), so a sick hero would trouble him. Of course, he later compromised and let Dr Strange have injured hands - essentially the same plot, but Steven Strange needed a handsome face! Who came up with that name? We do not have minutes to the story conference, so cannot know for sure. but throughout his career, from start to end, Kirby was coming up with wild new ideas, indicating that he read widely. In contrast, Stan Lee's career up to 1961 consisted of copying whatever comics sold well from other publishers. When Stan Lee did not have Kirby around him he didn't create any memorable characters. So in the absence of other evidence an interesting name like Droom is more likely to be from Kirby than from Lee.
So who wrote the Droom story?
We cannot be sure of course because we don't have the original pencils or marginal notes. All we can say with reasonable confidence is that the story was changed. Why would Stan Lee change his own story, and to give it such a weird ending? It looks like the original ending had something he felt would not work (such as an imperfect hero, or two people with the same face, which could confuse readers). The point is that this is not the story that Stan would have written. So who wrote it? Kirby was an old pro, and almost certainly sketched the story out for Ditko, whereas Ditko was still relatively junior. So the plot was probably by Kirby, as was normal practice at the time, as we saw previously.
So the origin story was probably by Kirby. The Costume was definitely
by Kirby. The name Dr Strange? The Kirby Dr Strange story was written
by "Stan Lee and Robert Bernstein". An unknown would not have plotted
it, so the plot was probably agreed in a story conference between Kirby
and Lee as normal, with Bernstein adding the dialog at the end. So who
came up with the name, Kirby or Lee? As with the name Droom, Kirby has the better track record but we don't know for sure.
Dr Strange: summary
So Kirby probably created the story outline and the costume for Dr Strange, and there's a good chance he invented the name as well. Of course, Ditko's distinctive art and plots made Dr Strange a hit. But just as with every other major Marvel character, we find Jack Kirby's probably had the initial idea.
Kirby had created plenty of teams of young adventurers: Boy's Ranch, Young Allies, Boy Commandos, etc. But what about a team with mutant superpowers? Nathan Summers (of "How Would You Fix..?") noticed this:
"in Yellow Claw #2 from December 1956 where Jack not only got penciler but writer credit as well, the titular villain gathers a group of mutants intending to use their combined brainpower which he claims will prove more effective than a dozen H-bombs. In the story Kirby has FBI agent Jimmy Woo define mutants as "'people with deviations... in either mind or body... or both!'".
This is basically the plot of the X-Men, but seven years earlier. And purely by Jack Kirby. Kirby's stories often featured mutants whose powers came from radiation. Here is another Kirby mutant team:
And here's an early "Blue Bolt" story from 1940 (thanks to Patrick Ford for pointing this out):
Incidentally, note the reference to cosmic rays (the source of the Fantastic Four's powers) and the similarity with Modok. And how the giant brained person shuts off the switch just in time - an idea Kirby used again in Fantastic Four 29:
The more we read Kirby's comics, the more we see that the Marvel comic stories were almost pure Kirby. Take any page from a Kirby Marvel story and we see the same story elements in previous Kirby work. But very few of them are in Stan Lee work. Everything about the ideas screams Kirby, not Lee.
The remaining details of the X-Men (outcasts, led by a man in a wheelchair, enemies called "the brotherhood", tag-line "the world's strangest heroes") are identical to Doom Patrol, a DC comic that came out three months earlier.
(Image from Cracked)
This looks like another of Stan Lee's famous rip-offs:
Three months is not long enough to read a comic on the news stands and then create your own comic, so this argues for inside information. At the time, some DC artists were secretly moonlighting for Marvel: Gene Colan called himself Adam Austin, Gil Kane called himself Scott Edward, Jerry Siegel called himself "Joe Carter", etc. So Stan Lee, as editor, was in regular contact with insiders at DC. Arnold Drake, creator of Doom patrol, explained:
' ...I’ve become more and more
convinced that [Stan Lee] knowingly stole The X-Men from The Doom
Patrol. Over the years I learned that an awful lot of writers and
artists were working surreptitiously between [Marvel and DC]. Therefore
from when I first brought the idea into [DC editor] Murray Boltinoff’s
office, it would’ve been easy for someone to walk over and hear that [I
was] working on a story about a bunch of reluctant superheroes who are
led by a man in a wheelchair. So over the years I began to feel that
Stan had more lead time than I realized. He may well have had four, five
or even six months. '
On a previous page we saw the evidence that Jack Kirby plotted the
Fantastic Four, and then Stan Lee wrote the dialog based on Kirby's
notes. On this page we saw that Kirby had the initial idea for the
Fantastic Four, and he probably created the other major Marvel
characters as well. Sometimes Lee
remembers it differently, but Stan's memory is not reliable. All the
facts point to Jack Kirby being the ideas man, and Stan Lee being the
promoter and public face of the business.
If that seems hard to believe, just look around you today. Today, Marvel makes most of its money from movies. Stan Lee's face is on every Marvel movie, because he is the company mascot. But he does not make the creative decisions. Nothing has changed.